This election isn’t the first to
win my attention. This blog started as a response to the ’04 Presidential
contest, and twenty years before that,
having been raised in a household of Democrats, I remember my Grandmother
comforting me after Mondale’s defeat. I’ve followed every contest since that
(then) bitter Reagan win, and been fascinated with the workings of Presidential
elections, from the time of the Founders until today. There’s not much that I
thought could surprise me.
Oopsie.
This election has turned into a
circus, a free for all between a blowhard celebrity and a ruthless member of
the political machine. It’s a farce, a down and dirty tussle in the mud; there
is no line that cannot be crossed, no allegation a step too far, no behind the
scenes machination that is ruled unethical. Unquestionably the worst ballot in
my lifetime, it is a mess, a travesty, and nothing short of a schoolyard brawl.
I love it.
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I
believe everything I wrote in the last paragraph, and I think this is a near
perfect example of what an election should NOT be. But, on principle, I enjoy
the tussle of an election year: it is the one time when Americans discuss
something more important than celebrity gossip and fad diets, when debates on
the direction of our country take place in offices, homes, and online – even if
discussions are shallow and revolve around memes and talking points.
You might hate to hear it, but
the 2016 election is the American political experiment in action, and it is to
be celebrated.
Alas, neither candidate is worth
the hoopla.
I dismissed Trump early,
convinced that more experienced, thoughtful Republicans like Jeb Bush would
carry the day. I misjudged the anger of the common man, and Trump barreled
through the primaries. I thought he would moderate, if not his views, than his
approach, once he had the nomination. Wrong again. I understand the gut appeal
of a candidate that speaks his mind, that isn’t handcuffed by the rigid and
empty scripts most politicians regurgitate. But a nice bit of Presidential
decorum would have been nice to see.
And then Hillary. My word. She’s
the unwelcome guest at dinner that just never leaves. For thirty years she’s
been despised by the Right, barely tolerated by the Left, and repeatedly passed
over by the center. She’s on pace to
become the first female American President, yet the resume of this “most
experienced candidate ever” is an unimpressive carpetbagging stint in the
Senate, a deeply flawed run as Secretary of State, and a marriage to a former
President. She could barely knock out a 74 year old Socialist in the primaries
(and then, only with a little help from the DNC), and has stumbled and bumbled
her way into almost losing the general election to a much disliked television star.
My word, THIS is the best
American female we had to offer?
We really should be allowed a
mulligan on this election.
So they’re both awful, awful candidates.
But you have to vote for someone, and assuming you correctly believe voting 3rd
party is about as valuable as staying home and watching bread mold, whom do you
choose?
(Disclaimer:
Here in Wisconsin the state’s electoral votes will almost certainly go to
Hillary, relieving me of any obligation to vote one way or the other. Alas,
with a crucial Senate race at stake, I’ll be in the voting booth, but with a
conscience free ability to vote 3rd party if I desire)
I’ll give you another disclaimer
at this point, and I won’t even hide it in parenthesis. There is one part of
me, the part of me that is contrarian, the part of me that’s blunt by nature
and appreciates it in kind, the part of me that recognizes the duplicity and
ignorance of the media . . . well, that part of me would love to see a Trump
victory just so I could collect and drink the tears of the Left. The very
thought gives me shivers.
Alas, so does the prospect of a
Trump win.
He wouldn’t be the worst
President ever. You’ll never convince me that a man of his great and long
lasting business success would somehow surpass Millard Filmore and Andrew
Johnson on that score. I don’t care how many bad words he said, or how many
millennials he triggered into running for their safe spaces, or how many people
somehow equate protecting our border with racism. I don’t buy the propaganda,
sorry.
But I think that Clinton would
do a better job at managing the ship of state. I think she’d govern from the
center, with occasional veers to the Left for show, ala her husband, and that
overseas she’d continue in the vein of a closeted warhawk, just like Obama. I
believe she’d do a decent job, with most of her egregious errors being
unrecognizable in the short term, which is what a President needs to maintain a
decent poll rating. No big snafus like invading Iraq only to come up empty on
WMD’s – no, her mistakes will be subtler, like the Arab Spring she promoted. It
led to ISIS, and Syria, and God knows what else, but at a comfortable enough distance
that it’s rarely (but properly) laid at her feet except by the partisan
opposition.
The problem is, she’s dishonest.
Not dishonest in the vein of all politicians, or dishonest in a “I’ll lie in my
campaign promises” way. She’s dishonest in a manner I’ve never come across in a
politician, the consistent and pervasive lies of someone that’s skated on thin
ice for decades but come out with nary a scratch, and assumes that streak will
continue into the future. A crook properly caught and punished may change their
ways; a crook that constantly avoids conviction is just emboldened. If she
isn’t indicted for her perjury to Congress over her email snafu, then mark my
words: at some point, probably just when the administration is going well,
she’ll screw up anew, and the lies will catch up to her. We’ll watch another
Clinton Presidency become bogged down in an impeachment, and unlike Bill (whose
impeachment I thought was undue) she won’t come out a winner.
I don’t want to see the already
much tarnished reputation of the Oval Office roughed up even more. I don’t want
this nation, at a time of turmoil, when our traditional enemies are rising yet
again, to be preoccupied with bulls**t and scandal.
I can’t, in good conscience,
vote for her. I’ll acknowledge her as President if she wins. I’ll root for her general success, as it is
America’s success, when she’s in office. But I know what trouble awaits, and I
can’t mortgage this nation voluntarily. I can’t.
You want an answer as to who to
vote for? Who *I’m* voting for? Good luck, because the best I can give you is
this: I won’t vote for Hillary.
To those who fret and panic over this election; to those who
label it “The Most Important Election of Our Lifetime,” (as opposed to the last
“Most Important Election,” and the next), breathe easy.
This might be the least
important election ever. The country is starkly but civilly divided, and
whichever candidate takes office will face a determined and obstructionist foe
in Congress. We’ll get bogged down by bureaucracy and the status quo. Critics
will cite this as proof the system is broken, but critics are morons. The
system is designed this way. It’s built to put a check on the President, to
avoid a rubber stamp on Executive Power. It was designed to lumber along, and that’s
what it will do.
The Republic will survive. Will
it be the better for it after this fiasco? That’s not up to me. That’s up to
the voters of the 2020 “Most Important Election Ever” to decide.