I'm a huge fan of Robert B Parker. That in itself is odd, considering his text is sparse and far closer to the Hemingway school of writing than the elaborate and sprawling texts I usually prefer.
[there is a great quote out there by Herman Wouk. I wish I could remember it verbatim, but it goes on about Hemingway and dismisses his style, saying he prefers a novel that isn't afraid to use and appreciate the English language]
Ten years ago though, I began to write off Parker's work. The plots and characterizations were becoming cookie-cutter affairs, and with each novel the size of the text seemed to increase, padding out what would otherwise have been a skimpy novella.
In recent years however, the Spenser series has returned to some of its early glory. In his twilight Parker has begun to use each of the novels as a testing ground. He's reintroduced minor figures from previous novels, expanded on what we think we know about the big players in his universe, and spent a lot of time thinking about the past.
In a number of ways, Parker seems to be prepping his characters for the author's own inevitable end.
In Now & Then Spenser is hired to verify a wife's affair on behalf of an FBI agent, and soon enough both the Mrs. and the client turn up dead. It turns out the wife's lover was a member of a terrorist organization, one that could afford to leave no witnesses. As expected Spenser is on the case to the bitter end, paying client or not, but that isn't what this book is about.
Time and again Spenser and his long-time love Susan (easily one of the most hated 'good guys' in the mystery world) reference an affair she had in a previous novel - 'long ago' in Spenser's world, thirty years ago in our own. The affair has rarely been brought up in the intervening years, but here it's made clear that the scars of that incident have never gone away.
As much as Spenser works to clear the case, he's working just as hard to excise the demons of that ancient betrayal.
And in the end, what is legitimately a shock - the couple begins to talk about getting married, an event no Spenser fan could ever see coming.
Not the best book to introduce a new fan to the series, but a fine, solid work. 3 out of 4, or 79 out of 100.
I haven't read crime novels for many years--just got more interested in other things--but glad to hear that you think Parker got back to some solid writing.
ReplyDeleteI feel that way about James Patterson--I liked quite a few of his earlier books, but the last few I've read have seemed to me to be nothing more than "write-by-number" books. I hate to use the word "hack," but that's kind of how I feel about him now. I even told Ken to not worry about buying me anymore Patterson books for Christmas, because there are plenty of other authors I'd rather read. People used to criticize Stephen King for being a hack and cranking out books, but he's gotten better over the years--Patterson just seems to be phoning it in.
Beth
I loved, then dismissed Parker for all the same reasons but do find I am again a bit enthralled. :)
ReplyDeleteI have this in my to-read file...sorry but I think you gave two major events away in this review...wish you hadn't! I think you needed more content about the book as opposed to Parker himself...or make two different entries...Parker is a different type of writer...definitely...and anybody that watched his show may realize that his books are often almost a screen play of an action show...I think that is why I enjoy them since I watched the show so often and enjoyed the characters...
ReplyDeleteGlad you are a fan! I enjoy him too!
IP - thank for the comment. Regarding giving away two major events, nope, I have to disagree. The bit about marriage maybe, and I questioned its inclusion after the fact, but it is discussed early in the book and with some frequency. It shocks you (which is why it earns a 'maybe') but I think it was fair game. Frankly, it should almost have found its way onto the dust jacket as a teaser.
ReplyDeleteI have to assume the second bit is about the FBI wife's affair. Much of that is spelled out in the first few chapters (I remember it being in the first 15 minutes of reading) and then all but abandoned as Spenser wanders down his usual philosophical/action path. Like most Parker books, giving away the 'plot' is akin to 'ruining' The Alamo by tipping you off that the Texans lose.
But I agree that the review is too much about the author and too little about the book. I'll do better in the future.
Regards
Dan